Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. JLab Audio Go Air

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and JLab Audio Go Air. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. JLab Audio Go Air Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 JLab Audio Go Air
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 14 g -
Dimensions & Weight Details - Earbud: 5 g
Charging case: 50 g
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green Black, navy | Grey, white | Black, green | Black
Protection Sweat-resistant -
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 9.14 m Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have a greater operating distance than JLab Audio Go Air.
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 JLab Audio Go Air
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0 JLab Audio Go Air have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Sound Effects - Bass Boost, Signature Sound
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 106 dB 103 dB Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have higher sensitivity than JLab Audio Go Air.
Impedance 16 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 6 mm 8 mm JLab Audio Go Air have a thicker diaphragm than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 JLab Audio Go Air
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
Sensitivity - -38 dB
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 JLab Audio Go Air
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track -
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 JLab Audio Go Air
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 JLab Audio Go Air
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable 2 x headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 43 mAh
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 5 hour(s) Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 lasts longer on a single charge than the JLab Audio Go Air.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 5 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 20 hours
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 1.5 hour(s) JLab Audio Go Air recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Included Qty - 2
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 JLab Audio Go Air
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) 3 pairs of gel ear tips, charging cable, charging case (380 mAh)
Compliant Standards - IPX4
Service & Support - Limited warranty - parts - 2 years
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with JLab Audio Go Air
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: