Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. ifrogz AirTime Sport

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and ifrogz AirTime Sport. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. ifrogz AirTime Sport Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime Sport
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 14 g -
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green Mint
Protection Sweat-resistant Sweat-resistant, IPX5
Design Sports Sports
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m -
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime Sport
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear - over-the-ear mount
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0 ifrogz AirTime Sport have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 106 dB 100 dB Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have higher sensitivity than ifrogz AirTime Sport.
Impedance 16 Ohm 16 Ohm
Diaphragm 6 mm 6 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
Features - Voice control
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime Sport
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime Sport
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, voice assistant
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime Sport
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable -
FEATURES Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime Sport
Intelligent Assistant - Siri
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime Sport
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable 2 x headphone battery rechargeable - wireless charging
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 5 hour(s) Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 lasts longer on a single charge than the ifrogz AirTime Sport.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 25 hours
Continuous playback: up to 5 hours
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 1 hour(s) ifrogz AirTime Sport recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Included Qty - 2
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime Sport
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) 3 pairs of ear tips, pair of memory foam ear tips, USB-C charging cable, wireless charging case
Compliant Standards - IPX5
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with ifrogz AirTime Sport
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: