Sony WI-C400 vs. ifrogz Flex Arc

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Sony WI-C400 and ifrogz Flex Arc. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Sony WI-C400 vs. ifrogz Flex Arc Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Sony WI-C400 ifrogz Flex Arc
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless - NFC Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 35 g -
Colour Black Black | White
Protection - Sweat-resistant
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) - 10 m
SOUND QUALITY Sony WI-C400 ifrogz Flex Arc
Headphones Form Factor In-ear - behind-the-neck mount In-ear - behind-the-neck mount
Headphones Technology Dynamic -
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version - Bluetooth 4.1
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 8 - 22000 Hz -
Diaphragm 9 mm 8 mm Sony WI-C400 have a thicker diaphragm than ifrogz Flex Arc.
Magnet Material Neodymium -
MICROPHONE Sony WI-C400 ifrogz Flex Arc
Form Factor Built-in -
Active Noise Cancelling - Yes
REMOTE CONTROL Sony WI-C400 ifrogz Flex Arc
Controls Volume, answer/end, play/pause Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track
CABLE Sony WI-C400 ifrogz Flex Arc
Cable Type USB cable - 50 m -
FEATURES Sony WI-C400 ifrogz Flex Arc
Features Vibrating call alert -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Sony WI-C400 ifrogz Flex Arc
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 20 hour(s) 8 hour(s) Sony WI-C400 lasts longer on a single charge than the ifrogz Flex Arc.
Charging Time 4.5 hour(s) -
CONNECTIONS Sony WI-C400 ifrogz Flex Arc
Connector Type USB (5 pin Micro-USB Type B) -
Other projects: