Skullcandy Method BT Sport vs. ifrogz AirTime

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Skullcandy Method BT Sport and ifrogz AirTime. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Skullcandy Method BT Sport vs. ifrogz AirTime Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz AirTime
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight - 51.02 g
Colour Navy blue | Black, mint Black | White | Blue
Protection Sweat-resistant Sweat-resistant, IPX4
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
SOUND QUALITY Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz AirTime
Headphones Form Factor Ear-bud - behind-the-neck mount In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Sound Output Mode - Stereo
Frequency Response - 20 - 20000 Hz
Sensitivity - 96 dB
Impedance - 32 Ohm
Diaphragm - 8 mm
Magnet Material - Neodymium
MICROPHONE Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz AirTime
Form Factor - Built-in
REMOTE CONTROL Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz AirTime
Controls Volume control, answer/end, next/previous track -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz AirTime
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 9 hour(s) 15 hour(s) ifrogz AirTime lasts longer on a single charge than the Skullcandy Method BT Sport.
Charging Time - 1.5 hour(s)
OTHERS Skullcandy Method BT Sport ifrogz AirTime
Included Accessories - 3 pairs of ear tips, charging case, micro-USB charging cable
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other projects: