Skullcandy Indy Evo vs. Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Skullcandy Indy Evo and Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Skullcandy Indy Evo vs. Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Skullcandy Indy Evo Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless
Product Type True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height 2.46 cm -
Width 4.6 cm -
Depth 2.17 cm -
Weight 57 g -
Dimensions & Weight Details Case: 57 g Charging case: 6.45 cm x 4 cm x 4.16 cm / 41.6 g
Charging case with earphones: 55 g
Earphone: 6.8 g
Colour Carefree yellow | Lucky purple | Centered champagne | Chill grey | 92 blue | Collina Strada | True black | Wild orange Black
Protection Dust-resistant, sweat-resistant, water-resistant Splashproof, IP54, dust protection
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 30 m -
SOUND QUALITY Skullcandy Indy Evo Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.2 Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Bluetooth Profiles - Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, AAC SBC, AAC, aptX
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 5 - 21000 Hz Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless offer a larger frequency range than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Max Input Power 10 mW -
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% <0.08% Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless have lower total harmonic distortion than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Sensitivity - 110 dB
Impedance 32 Ohm -
Max Sound Pressure 105 dB -
Diaphragm 6 mm 7 mm Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless have a thicker diaphragm than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Magnet Material NdFeB -
Features Built-in Tile Tracker -
MICROPHONE Skullcandy Indy Evo Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless
Form Factor Built-in Built-in
Frequency Response - 100 - 10000 Hz
REMOTE CONTROL Skullcandy Indy Evo Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless
Controls Volume control, answer/end, next/previous track, voice assistant -
CABLE Skullcandy Indy Evo Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless
Cable Type USB-C charge cable USB-C charge cable
FEATURES Skullcandy Indy Evo Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless
Features Touch control -
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible Yes -
Intelligent Assistant Siri, Google Assistant -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Skullcandy Indy Evo Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion
Battery Capacity 40 mAh 55 mAh Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless have a higher battery capacity than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 9 hour(s) Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless lasts longer on a single charge than the Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 30 hours
Continuous playback: up to 6 hours
Continuous playback: up to 9 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 27 hours
Charging Time 1 hour(s) 1.5 hour(s) Skullcandy Indy Evo recharge faster than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Included Qty 2 -
OTHERS Skullcandy Indy Evo Sennheiser SPORT True Wireless
Included Accessories 3 pairs of gel ear tips, charging case (500 mAh), 2 pairs of stability gels (small, large) Lanyard, 3 pairs of open type ear tips (small, medium, large), 4 pairs of EarFins, charging case (400 mAh), 3 pairs of closed type ear tips (small, medium, large)
Compliant Standards IP55 -
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years Limited warranty - 2 years
Other projects: