Skullcandy Crusher Evo vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Skullcandy Crusher Evo and Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Skullcandy Crusher Evo vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter
Weight 312 g 150 g Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams are lighter than Skullcandy Crusher Evo headphones.
Colour Collina Strada | Dark blue/green | True black | Grey -
Recommended Use Game console, portable electronics, computer -
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) - 30 m
SOUND QUALITY Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Headphones Form Factor Full size On-ear
Foldable Yes - Skullcandy Crusher Evo can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0 Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version.
Bluetooth Profiles - Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, mSBC
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Sound Effects Sensory Bass, Personal Sound -
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <1% -
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure 100 dB -
Diaphragm 40 mm 32 mm Skullcandy Crusher Evo have a thicker diaphragm than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Features - SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology
MICROPHONE Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Form Factor Built-in Headset microphone
Type - Boom
Microphone Operation Mode - Uni-directional
Microphones Included - 2
REMOTE CONTROL Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Controls Volume, bass, answer/end, next/previous track, voice assistant Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant
CABLE Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Cable Type USB-C charge cable - detachable
Headphones cable - detachable
-
FEATURES Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Features Tile finding technology Voice alerts
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible Yes Yes
Intelligent Assistant Alexa ready, Google Assistant ready, Siri ready Alexa
BATTERY AND CHARGING Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 360 mAh
Battery Life 40 hour(s) 15 hour(s) Skullcandy Crusher Evo lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 40 hours Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
Standby Time - 312 hours
Charging Time 1 hour(s) 1.5 hour(s) Skullcandy Crusher Evo recharge faster than Skullcandy Crusher Evo.
CONNECTIONS Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Connector Type - Wireless adapter (USB Type-C)
OTHERS Skullcandy Crusher Evo Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Included Accessories Travel bag Bluetooth USB-C adapter
Service & Support Limited warranty - 1 year -
Other Comparisons with Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: