Sennheiser HD 350BT vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Sennheiser HD 350BT and Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Sennheiser HD 350BT vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter
Weight 238 g 150 g Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams are lighter than Sennheiser HD 350BT headphones.
Colour Black | White -
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) - 30 m
SOUND QUALITY Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Headphones Form Factor Full size On-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic -
Ear Cups Type Closed -
Foldable Yes - Sennheiser HD 350BT can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0 Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, AAC, aptX, apt-X LL SBC, mSBC
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 18 - 22000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Sennheiser HD 350BT offer a larger frequency range than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <0.3% -
Impedance - 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure 108 dB -
Diaphragm - 32 mm
Features - SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology
MICROPHONE Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Form Factor Built-in Headset microphone
Type - Boom
Microphone Operation Mode Beamforming Uni-directional
Frequency Response 80 - 6000 Hz -
Microphones Included 2 2 Both headphones have a built-in microphone.
REMOTE CONTROL Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Controls - Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant
CABLE Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Cable Type USB-C charge cable - detachable -
FEATURES Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Features - Voice alerts
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible - Yes
Intelligent Assistant - Alexa
BATTERY AND CHARGING Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity 300 mAh 360 mAh Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a higher battery capacity than Sennheiser HD 350BT.
Battery Life 30 hours 15 hour(s) Sennheiser HD 350BT lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
Standby Time - 312 hours
Charging Time 2 hours 1.5 hour(s) Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams recharge faster than Sennheiser HD 350BT.
CONNECTIONS Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Connector Type - Wireless adapter (USB Type-C)
OTHERS Sennheiser HD 350BT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Included Accessories - Bluetooth USB-C adapter
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years -
Other Comparisons with Sennheiser HD 350BT
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: