RIG 600 vs. JBL Everest 310

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of RIG 600 and JBL Everest 310. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

RIG 600 vs. JBL Everest 310 Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS RIG 600 JBL Everest 310
Product Type Headset - wired Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Colour - Gun metal
Earpad Material Memory foam -
Recommended Use - Portable electronics
SOUND QUALITY RIG 600 JBL Everest 310
Headphones Form Factor Full size On-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic Dynamic
Foldable - Yes JBL Everest 310 can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wired Wireless
Wireless Technology - Bluetooth
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 10 - 22000 Hz JBL Everest 310 offer a larger frequency range than RIG 600.
Max Input Power 40 mW -
Sensitivity 111 dB -
Impedance 32 Ohm -
Diaphragm 40 mm 40 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
MICROPHONE RIG 600 JBL Everest 310
Form Factor - Built-in
Type Boom -
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional -
Frequency Response 100 - 10000 Hz -
Sensitivity -45 dBV/Pascal -
Signal-To-Noise Ratio 42 dB -
Microphone Features Mute function -
REMOTE CONTROL RIG 600 JBL Everest 310
Controls Volume, answer/end, microphone on/mute -
BATTERY AND CHARGING RIG 600 JBL Everest 310
Battery Type - Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life - 20 hour(s)
Charging Time - 2 hour(s)
CONNECTIONS RIG 600 JBL Everest 310
Connector Type Headset (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 4-pole) Headphones (mini-phone 3.5 mm 4-pole)
OTHERS RIG 600 JBL Everest 310
Included Accessories 2 headset microphones Carrying case, micro-USB charging cable
Service & Support Limited warranty - 1 year -
Other projects: