Razer Thresher Ultimate vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Razer Thresher Ultimate and Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Razer Thresher Ultimate vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Product Type Headset - 7.1 channel - 2.4 GHz - wireless Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter
Height 21.4 cm -
Width 19.6 cm -
Depth 10.48 cm -
Weight 408 g 150 g Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams are lighter than Razer Thresher Ultimate headphones.
Colour Black -
Earpad Material Leatherette, memory foam -
Recommended Use Game console -
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 12 m 30 m Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a greater operating distance than Razer Thresher Ultimate.
SOUND QUALITY Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Headphones Form Factor Full size On-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology 2.4 GHz radio frequency Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version - Bluetooth 5.0
Bluetooth Profiles - Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, mSBC
Noise Isolating Yes - Razer Thresher Ultimate are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode 7.1 channel surround Stereo
Built-in Decoders Dolby Headphone -
Frequency Response 12 - 28000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Razer Thresher Ultimate offer a larger frequency range than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 50 mm 32 mm Razer Thresher Ultimate have a thicker diaphragm than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Magnet Material Neodymium -
Features - SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology
MICROPHONE Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Form Factor - Headset microphone
Type Boom Boom
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional Uni-directional
Frequency Response 100 - 10000 Hz -
Sensitivity -38 dBV/Pascal -
Signal-To-Noise Ratio 55 dB -
Microphone Features Retractable microphone -
Microphones Included - 2
REMOTE CONTROL Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Controls Volume, microphone on/mute Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant
FEATURES Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Features - Voice alerts
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible - Yes
Intelligent Assistant - Alexa
BATTERY AND CHARGING Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Battery Type Headset battery rechargeable Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 360 mAh
Battery Life 16 hours 15 hour(s) Razer Thresher Ultimate lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
Standby Time - 312 hours
Charging Time 4 hours 1.5 hour(s) Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams recharge faster than Razer Thresher Ultimate.
WIRELESS LINK Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Transmission Range 12 m -
CONNECTIONS Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Connector Type - Wireless adapter (USB Type-C)
OTHERS Razer Thresher Ultimate Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Included Accessories Base station, stand Bluetooth USB-C adapter
Other Comparisons with Razer Thresher Ultimate
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: