Razer Hammerhead True Wireless vs. Skullcandy Indy Evo

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Razer Hammerhead True Wireless and Skullcandy Indy Evo. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Razer Hammerhead True Wireless vs. Skullcandy Indy Evo Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Razer Hammerhead True Wireless Skullcandy Indy Evo
Product Type True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 2.46 cm
Width - 4.6 cm
Depth - 2.17 cm
Weight - 57 g
Dimensions & Weight Details - Case: 57 g
Colour - Carefree yellow | Lucky purple | Centered champagne | Chill grey | 92 blue | Collina Strada | True black | Wild orange
Protection Splashproof, waterproof, IPX4 Dust-resistant, sweat-resistant, water-resistant
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 30 m Skullcandy Indy Evo have a greater operating distance than Razer Hammerhead True Wireless.
SOUND QUALITY Razer Hammerhead True Wireless Skullcandy Indy Evo
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 EDR Bluetooth 5.0 Skullcandy Indy Evo have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Razer Hammerhead True Wireless.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, AAC SBC, AAC
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Max Input Power 8 mW 10 mW
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) - <3%
Sensitivity 91 dB -
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure - 105 dB
Diaphragm 13 mm 6 mm Razer Hammerhead True Wireless have a thicker diaphragm than Skullcandy Indy Evo.
Magnet Material - NdFeB
Features - Built-in Tile Tracker
MICROPHONE Razer Hammerhead True Wireless Skullcandy Indy Evo
Form Factor Built-in Built-in
Microphone Operation Mode Omni-directional -
Frequency Response 300 - 5000 Hz -
Sensitivity -42 dB -
Signal-To-Noise Ratio 55 dB -
REMOTE CONTROL Razer Hammerhead True Wireless Skullcandy Indy Evo
Controls Power on/off, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, skip track, pair mode, voice assistant Volume control, answer/end, next/previous track, voice assistant
CABLE Razer Hammerhead True Wireless Skullcandy Indy Evo
Cable Type USB-C charge cable - detachable USB-C charge cable
FEATURES Razer Hammerhead True Wireless Skullcandy Indy Evo
Features Touch control Touch control
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible - Yes
Intelligent Assistant - Siri, Google Assistant
BATTERY AND CHARGING Razer Hammerhead True Wireless Skullcandy Indy Evo
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 40 mAh
Battery Life 3 hour(s) 6 hour(s) Skullcandy Indy Evo lasts longer on a single charge than the Razer Hammerhead True Wireless.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 3 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 13 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 30 hours
Continuous playback: up to 6 hours
Charging Time 1.5 hour(s) 1 hour(s) Skullcandy Indy Evo recharge faster than Razer Hammerhead True Wireless.
Included Qty - 2
OTHERS Razer Hammerhead True Wireless Skullcandy Indy Evo
Included Accessories Wrist strap, charging case, silicone ear tip 3 pairs of gel ear tips, charging case (500 mAh), 2 pairs of stability gels (small, large)
Compatibility iPhone, iPad, iPod, Android phone -
Compliant Standards - IP55
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years Limited warranty - 2 years
Other Comparisons with Razer Hammerhead True Wireless
Other Comparisons with Skullcandy Indy Evo
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: