Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams vs. JVC HA NP35T

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams and JVC HA NP35T. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams vs. JVC HA NP35T Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Product Type Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 150 g 12 g JVC HA NP35T are lighter than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams headphones.
Dimensions & Weight Details - Charging case: 11.4 cm x 5.75 cm x 3.8 cm / 73 g
Colour - Blue | Black | White
Protection - Waterproof, sweat-resistant
Recommended Use - Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 30 m 10 m Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a greater operating distance than JVC HA NP35T.
SOUND QUALITY Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Headphones Form Factor On-ear On-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.1 JVC HA NP35T have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP), Low Complexity Subband Coding (SBC)
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, mSBC SBC
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Sound Effects - Bass-reflex
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Impedance 32 Ohm 16 Ohm
Diaphragm 32 mm 16 mm Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a thicker diaphragm than JVC HA NP35T.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
Features SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology -
MICROPHONE Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Form Factor Headset microphone Built-in
Type Boom -
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional -
Microphones Included 2 -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Controls Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant -
CABLE Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Cable Type - Charging cable - detachable
FEATURES Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Features Voice alerts Touch control, noise reduction
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible Yes -
Intelligent Assistant Alexa -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Battery Type Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion
Battery Capacity 360 mAh -
Battery Life 15 hour(s) 7 hour(s) Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams lasts longer on a single charge than the JVC HA NP35T.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
Continuous playback: up to 7 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 17 hours
Standby Time 312 hours -
Charging Time 1.5 hour(s) 2.5 hour(s) Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams recharge faster than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
CONNECTIONS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Connector Type Wireless adapter (USB Type-C) -
OTHERS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams JVC HA NP35T
Included Accessories Bluetooth USB-C adapter Charging case
Compliant Standards - IPX4
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 1 year
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Comparisons with JVC HA NP35T
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: