Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams vs. Bose QuietComfort 45

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams and Bose QuietComfort 45. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams vs. Bose QuietComfort 45 Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Product Type Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 18.4 cm
Width - 15.2 cm
Depth - 7.62 cm
Weight 150 g 241 g Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams are lighter than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams headphones.
Dimensions & Weight Details - Case: 14.5 cm x 5.08 cm x 21.1 cm / 188 g
Colour - Black | Smoke white | Triple black
Recommended Use - Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 30 m 9 m Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a greater operating distance than Bose QuietComfort 45.
SOUND QUALITY Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Headphones Form Factor On-ear Full size
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.1 Bose QuietComfort 45 have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, mSBC -
Active Noise Cancelling - Yes Bose QuietComfort 45 are equipped with active noice cancellation.
Active Noise Cancelling Technology - Acoustic Noise Cancelling
Noise Isolating - Yes Bose QuietComfort 45 are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz -
Impedance 32 Ohm -
Diaphragm 32 mm -
Features SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology -
MICROPHONE Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Form Factor Headset microphone -
Type Boom -
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional -
Microphones Included 2 -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Controls Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant -
CABLE Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Cable Type - USB-C to USB-A cable - detachable - 30 cm
FEATURES Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Features Voice alerts -
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible Yes -
Intelligent Assistant Alexa -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Battery Type Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion
Battery Capacity 360 mAh 460 mAh Bose QuietComfort 45 have a higher battery capacity than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life 15 hour(s) 24 hour(s) Bose QuietComfort 45 lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
-
Standby Time 312 hours -
Charging Time 1.5 hour(s) 2.5 hour(s) Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams recharge faster than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
CONNECTIONS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Connector Type Wireless adapter (USB Type-C) -
OTHERS Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Bose QuietComfort 45
Included Accessories Bluetooth USB-C adapter Carrying case
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Comparisons with Bose QuietComfort 45
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: