Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) vs. beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) and beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) vs. beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Product Type Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless - 3.5 mm jack
Series UC Series -
Weight 150 g 400 g Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) are lighter than Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) headphones.
Colour - Copper
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 30 m 10 m Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) have a greater operating distance than beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper.
SOUND QUALITY Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Headphones Form Factor On-ear Full size
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Ear Cups Type - Closed
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.2 beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series).
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP), General Audio/Video Distribution Profile (GAVDP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, apt-X LL
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 5 - 40000 Hz beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper offer a larger frequency range than Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series).
Max Input Power - 200 mW
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) - <0.05%
Sensitivity 94 dB -
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure - 100 dB
Diaphragm 32 mm -
Features SoundGuard Technology -
MICROPHONE Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Form Factor - Built-in
Type Boom -
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional -
Microphones Included 2 -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Controls Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, voice assistant
CABLE Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Cable Type - Headphones cable - detachable - with remote control and mic - 1.2 m
Cable Length - 1.2 m
FEATURES Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Features Voice alerts -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Battery Type Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Capacity 360 mAh 1050 mAh beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper have a higher battery capacity than Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series).
Battery Life 12 hour(s) 30 hour(s) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series).
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
-
Standby Time 312 hours -
Charging Time 1.5 hour(s) 2 hour(s) Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) recharge faster than Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series).
OTHERS Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series) beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Included Accessories Wireless headset system base, Bluetooth USB-C adapter Hard case, USB-C to USB-A charging cable
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 Office (UC Series)
Other Comparisons with beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless Copper
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: