In depth comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 and Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.
| DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Product Type | Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless | Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 175 g | 195 g | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 headphones. |
| Colour | Black | White | |
| Earpad Material | Memory foam | - | |
| Recommended Use | Portable electronics | Portable electronics | |
| Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) | 10 m | 10 m | The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same. |
| SOUND QUALITY | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Headphones Form Factor | Full size | On-ear | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headphones Technology | - | Dynamic | |
| Ear Cups Type | - | Closed | |
| Connectivity Technology | Wireless | Wireless | |
| Wireless Technology | Bluetooth | Bluetooth | |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605. |
| Bluetooth Profiles | Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) | Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) | |
| Bluetooth Audio Codec | SBC | - | |
| Frequency Response | 50 - 20000 Hz | 20 - 20000 Hz | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT offer a larger frequency range than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605. |
| Max Input Power | - | 10 mW | |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | <3% | - | |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB | 102 dB | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT have higher sensitivity than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605. |
| Impedance | 32 Ohm | 32 Ohm | |
| Diaphragm | 40 mm | PET - 32 mm | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 have a thicker diaphragm than Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT. |
| Simultaneously Connectable Devices Qty (Multipoint) | 2 | - | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 have the ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously. |
| Magnet Material | - | NdFeB |
| MICROPHONE | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Form Factor | Built-in | Built-in |
|---|
| REMOTE CONTROL | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Controls | Play/pause, next/previous track | Volume control, answer/end |
|---|
| CABLE | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Cable Type | USB charge cable Audio cable |
USB power cable - detachable |
|---|
| BATTERY AND CHARGING | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Battery Type | Headphone battery rechargeable | Headphone battery rechargeable | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | 18 hour(s) | 15 hour(s) | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 lasts longer on a single charge than the Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT. |
| Battery Life Details | - | Continuous playback: up to 15 hours | |
| Standby Time | 480 hours | - | |
| Charging Time | 90 min | 3 hour(s) | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605. |
| CONNECTIONS | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Connector Type | - | USB (power only) Bluetooth |
|---|
| OTHERS | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat GO 605 | Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT |
|---|
| Included Accessories | Carrying pouch | - |
|---|
cs
sk
de
it
es
fr
hu
pt
ru
pl
br
ro
