Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 vs. JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 and JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 vs. JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 19 g 16 g JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 headphones.
Colour Cobalt black | Copper gray Black
Protection Moisture-resistant, sweat-resistant Waterproof, sweat-resistant, IPX7
Design - Sports
Recommended Use Portable electronics, phone Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m -
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 3.0 Bluetooth 4.2 JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Sound Effects Super Bass Control (SBC) -
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 22000 Hz JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash offer a larger frequency range than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 102 dB/mW 95 dB Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 have higher sensitivity than JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash.
Impedance - 14 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure - 113 dB
Diaphragm - 5.8 mm
Features - TalkThru technology, JBL Charged Sound, Ambient Aware
In-Cord Volume Control Yes -
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
Noise Cancelling Yes - Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 microphone can cancel out ambient noise.
Sensitivity - -25 dBV/Pascal
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash
Controls Volume, skip track Power on/off, answer/end, microphone on/mute, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, voice assistant, TalkThru button
FEATURES Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash
Features - True wireless
Intelligent Assistant - Siri, Google Now
Additional Functions DSP -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion 2 x headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 85 mAh
Battery Life 6.5 hour(s) 5 hour(s) Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 lasts longer on a single charge than the JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash.
Standby Time 336 hours -
Charging Time 2.5 hour(s) 2 hour(s) JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3.
Included Qty - 2
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3 JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash
Included Accessories Charging case 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large), micro-USB charging cable, 3 pairs of wing tips (small, medium, large), charging case (1500 mAh)
Software Included - MapMyRun premium membership (12 months)
Compatibility iPhone, iPad, iPod -
Compliant Standards - IPX7
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 1 year
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat Go 3
Other Comparisons with JBL Under Armour True Wireless Flash
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: