Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) vs. Skullcandy Sesh Evo

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) and Skullcandy Sesh Evo. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) vs. Skullcandy Sesh Evo Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Product Type True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 2.41 cm
Width - 2.28 cm
Depth - 2.56 cm
Weight 13 g -
Dimensions & Weight Details - Charging case: 3.45 cm x 3.88 cm x 7.86 cm
Colour Black Curious blue | True black | Bleached blue | Deep red
Protection Waterproof, sweat-resistant, IPX5, IP57 Dust-resistant, sweat-resistant, water-resistant, IP55
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 30 m -
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Headphones Form Factor In-ear - over-the-ear mount In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0 Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, AAC
Noise Isolating Yes - Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Sound Effects Bass Boost -
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Max Input Power - 3 mW
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% <3% Both headphones have the same total harmonic distortion.
Sensitivity 94 dB -
Impedance - 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure - 105 dB
Diaphragm 13.5 mm 6 mm Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) have a thicker diaphragm than Skullcandy Sesh Evo.
Magnet Material - NdFeB
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Form Factor Built-in Built-in
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Controls Mute, volume control, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, voice assistant Volume control, answer/end, next/previous track, voice assistant
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Cable Type - USB-C charge cable - detachable - 20 cm
FEATURES Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Features Voice alerts -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Battery Type 2 x headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity 90 mAh 43 mAh Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) have a higher battery capacity than Skullcandy Sesh Evo.
Battery Life 8 hour(s) 5 hour(s) Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) lasts longer on a single charge than the Skullcandy Sesh Evo.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 8 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 24 hours
(with included charging case): up to 24 hours
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 1 hour(s) Skullcandy Sesh Evo recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud).
Included Qty 2 -
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud) Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Included Accessories - USB charging cable, charging case (500 mAh)
Compliant Standards - IP55
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 3200 (Left Earbud)
Other Comparisons with Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: