Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Skullcandy Sesh Evo

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and Skullcandy Sesh Evo. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Skullcandy Sesh Evo Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 2.41 cm
Width - 2.28 cm
Depth - 2.56 cm
Weight 14 g -
Dimensions & Weight Details - Charging case: 3.45 cm x 3.88 cm x 7.86 cm
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green Curious blue | True black | Bleached blue | Deep red
Protection Sweat-resistant Dust-resistant, sweat-resistant, water-resistant, IP55
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m -
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0 Skullcandy Sesh Evo have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, AAC
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Max Input Power - 3 mW
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% <3% Both headphones have the same total harmonic distortion.
Sensitivity 106 dB -
Impedance 16 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure - 105 dB
Diaphragm 6 mm 6 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
Magnet Material - NdFeB
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Volume control, answer/end, next/previous track, voice assistant
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable USB-C charge cable - detachable - 20 cm
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 43 mAh
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 5 hour(s) Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 lasts longer on a single charge than the Skullcandy Sesh Evo.
Battery Life Details - (with included charging case): up to 24 hours
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 1 hour(s) Skullcandy Sesh Evo recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) USB charging cable, charging case (500 mAh)
Compliant Standards - IP55
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with Skullcandy Sesh Evo
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: