Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Skullcandy Indy Evo

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and Skullcandy Indy Evo. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Skullcandy Indy Evo Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Indy Evo
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 2.46 cm
Width - 4.6 cm
Depth - 2.17 cm
Weight 14 g 57 g Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 headphones.
Dimensions & Weight Details - Case: 57 g
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green Carefree yellow | Lucky purple | Centered champagne | Chill grey | 92 blue | Collina Strada | True black | Wild orange
Protection Sweat-resistant Dust-resistant, sweat-resistant, water-resistant
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 30 m Skullcandy Indy Evo have a greater operating distance than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Indy Evo
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0 Skullcandy Indy Evo have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, AAC
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Max Input Power - 10 mW
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% <3% Both headphones have the same total harmonic distortion.
Sensitivity 106 dB -
Impedance 16 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure - 105 dB
Diaphragm 6 mm 6 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
Magnet Material - NdFeB
Features - Built-in Tile Tracker
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Indy Evo
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Indy Evo
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Volume control, answer/end, next/previous track, voice assistant
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Indy Evo
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable USB-C charge cable
FEATURES Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Indy Evo
Features - Touch control
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible - Yes
Intelligent Assistant - Siri, Google Assistant
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Indy Evo
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 40 mAh
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 6 hour(s) Both headphones last the same amount of time on a single charge.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 30 hours
Continuous playback: up to 6 hours
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 1 hour(s) Skullcandy Indy Evo recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Included Qty - 2
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Skullcandy Indy Evo
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) 3 pairs of gel ear tips, charging case (500 mAh), 2 pairs of stability gels (small, large)
Compliant Standards - IP55
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with Skullcandy Indy Evo
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: