Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 6.5 cm
Width - 4.2 cm
Depth - 3.6 cm
Weight 14 g 49 g Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 headphones.
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green White
Protection Sweat-resistant Splashproof, sweat-resistant
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.1 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 106 dB -
Impedance 16 Ohm -
Diaphragm 6 mm PET
Magnet Material - NdFeB
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Multiple function button
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable USB power cable - detachable
FEATURES Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Intelligent Assistant - Siri, Google Assistant
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 24 hour(s) Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 6 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 18 hours
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 1.5 hour(s) Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
CONNECTIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Connector Type - Bluetooth
USB (power only)
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) -
Compliant Standards - IPX4
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with Philips UpBeat TAT3215WT
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: