Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Philips TAT4556WT

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and Philips TAT4556WT. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Philips TAT4556WT Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 14 g -
Dimensions & Weight Details - Earbud: 2.31 cm x 2.67 cm x 2.43 cm
Charging case: 7.1 cm x 4 cm x 3.1 cm
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green White
Protection Sweat-resistant Splashproof, sweat-resistant
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.2 Philips TAT4556WT have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec - AAC
Active Noise Cancelling - Yes Philips TAT4556WT are equipped with active noice cancellation.
Active Noise Cancelling Technology - Adaptive Hybrid ANC
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Max Input Power - 10 mW
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 106 dB 98 dB Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have higher sensitivity than Philips TAT4556WT.
Impedance 16 Ohm 16 Ohm
Diaphragm 6 mm 12 mm Philips TAT4556WT have a thicker diaphragm than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Features - 2-in-1 convertible from stereo to mono sound
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Voice assistant
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable USB-C cable - detachable - 28 cm
FEATURES Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Features - Touch control
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 50 mAh
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 9 hour(s) Philips TAT4556WT lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 2 hour(s) The charging of both headphones last the same time.
CONNECTIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Connector Type - USB (power only) (USB Type-C)
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT4556WT
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large), charging case (500 mAh)
Compliant Standards - IPX4
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with Philips TAT4556WT
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: