Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Philips TAT3216WT

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and Philips TAT3216WT. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Philips TAT3216WT Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 9 cm
Width - 4 cm
Depth - 5 cm
Weight 14 g 55 g Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 headphones.
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green White
Protection Sweat-resistant Splashproof, sweat-resistant, IPX5
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0 Philips TAT3216WT have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Max Input Power - 3 mW
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 106 dB 105 dB Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have higher sensitivity than Philips TAT3216WT.
Impedance 16 Ohm 16 Ohm
Diaphragm 6 mm 6 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track -
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable USB-C cable - detachable
FEATURES Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Features - Touch control
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Life 6 hour(s) -
Battery Life Details - Continuous talk: up to 6 hours
Continuous talk (with included charging case): up to 24 hours
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) -
CONNECTIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Connector Type - Bluetooth
USB (power only)
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Philips TAT3216WT
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) Charging case, 3 pair of ear caps
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 1 year
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with Philips TAT3216WT
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: