Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Marshall Minor III

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and Marshall Minor III. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. Marshall Minor III Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Marshall Minor III
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 14 g 4 g Marshall Minor III are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 headphones.
Dimensions & Weight Details - Charging case: 40 g
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green Black
Protection Sweat-resistant IPX4, water-resistant
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Marshall Minor III
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.2 Marshall Minor III have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 106 dB 93 dB Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have higher sensitivity than Marshall Minor III.
Impedance 16 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 6 mm 12 mm Marshall Minor III have a thicker diaphragm than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Marshall Minor III
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
Microphones Included - 2
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Marshall Minor III
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Answer/end, reject call
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Marshall Minor III
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable USB-C cable - detachable
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Marshall Minor III
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 5 hour(s) Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 lasts longer on a single charge than the Marshall Minor III.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 5 hours
Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 25 hours
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 1.5 hour(s) Marshall Minor III recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Marshall Minor III
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) Charging case
Compliant Standards - IPX4
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with Marshall Minor III
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: