Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. ifrogz AirTime

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 and ifrogz AirTime. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 vs. ifrogz AirTime Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 14 g 51.02 g Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 are lighter than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 headphones.
Colour Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green Black | White | Blue
Protection Sweat-resistant Sweat-resistant, IPX4
Design Sports -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m -
SOUND QUALITY Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 -
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <3% -
Sensitivity 106 dB 96 dB Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have higher sensitivity than ifrogz AirTime.
Impedance 16 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 6 mm 8 mm ifrogz AirTime have a thicker diaphragm than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
MICROPHONE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime
Controls Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track -
CABLE Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime
Cable Type Micro-USB charge cable -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 6 hour(s) 15 hour(s) ifrogz AirTime lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Standby Time 240 hours -
Charging Time 2 hour(s) 1.5 hour(s) ifrogz AirTime recharge faster than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
OTHERS Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 ifrogz AirTime
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) 3 pairs of ear tips, charging case, micro-USB charging cable
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Comparisons with ifrogz AirTime
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: