Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C vs. Philips SHP9600

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C and Philips SHP9600. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C vs. Philips SHP9600 Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C Philips SHP9600
Product Type Headset - wired - USB-C Headphones - wired - 3.5 mm jack
Series 300 Series -
Recommended Use Computer -
SOUND QUALITY Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C Philips SHP9600
Headphones Form Factor On-ear Full size
Ear Cups Type - Open
Connectivity Technology Wired Wired
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Frequency Response 50 - 8000 Hz 12 - 35000 Hz Philips SHP9600 offer a larger frequency range than Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C.
Max Input Power - 200 mW
Sensitivity - 101 dB
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure 118 dB -
Diaphragm 28 mm 50 mm Philips SHP9600 have a thicker diaphragm than Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
In-Cord Volume Control Yes -
MICROPHONE Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C Philips SHP9600
Type Boom -
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional -
REMOTE CONTROL Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C Philips SHP9600
Controls Mute, volume -
CABLE Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C Philips SHP9600
Cable Type Headset cable Headphones cable - detachable - 3 m
Detachable Cable - Yes
Plated Connector - Gold
CONNECTIONS Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C Philips SHP9600
Connector Type Headset (24 pin USB-C) Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm)
OTHERS Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C Philips SHP9600
Included Accessories - 3.5 mm to 6.3 mm adapter
Other projects: