Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT and Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter
Weight 195 g 150 g Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams are lighter than Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT headphones.
Colour White -
Recommended Use Portable electronics -
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 30 m Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a greater operating distance than Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT.
SOUND QUALITY Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Headphones Form Factor On-ear On-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic -
Ear Cups Type Closed -
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.2 Bluetooth 5.0 Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, mSBC
Sound Output Mode - Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Max Input Power 10 mW -
Sensitivity 102 dB -
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm PET - 32 mm 32 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
Magnet Material NdFeB -
Features - SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology
MICROPHONE Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Form Factor Built-in Headset microphone
Type - Boom
Microphone Operation Mode - Uni-directional
Microphones Included - 2
REMOTE CONTROL Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Controls Volume control, answer/end Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant
CABLE Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Cable Type USB power cable - detachable -
FEATURES Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Features - Voice alerts
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible - Yes
Intelligent Assistant - Alexa
BATTERY AND CHARGING Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity - 360 mAh
Battery Life 15 hour(s) 15 hour(s) Both headphones last the same amount of time on a single charge.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback: up to 15 hours Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
Standby Time - 312 hours
Charging Time 3 hour(s) 1.5 hour(s) Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams recharge faster than Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT.
CONNECTIONS Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Connector Type USB (power only)
Bluetooth
Wireless adapter (USB Type-C)
OTHERS Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Included Accessories - Bluetooth USB-C adapter
Other Comparisons with Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: