In depth comparison and review of OPPO Enco W31 and JBL TUNE Beam. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS | OPPO Enco W31 | JBL TUNE Beam |
---|
Product Type | True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless | True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless | |
---|---|---|---|
Weight | 50 g | 10 g | JBL TUNE Beam are lighter than OPPO Enco W31 headphones. |
Dimensions & Weight Details | - | Charging case: 50.3 g Earbud: 5 g |
|
Colour | Black | White | Black | White | Blue | Purple | |
Protection | Dust-resistant, IP54, water-resistant | Water-resistant, dust-proof | |
Recommended Use | Portable electronics | Portable electronics | |
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) | 10 m | - |
SOUND QUALITY | OPPO Enco W31 | JBL TUNE Beam |
---|
Headphones Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear | |
---|---|---|---|
Headphones Technology | Dynamic | - | |
Connectivity Technology | Wireless | Wireless | |
Wireless Technology | Bluetooth | Bluetooth | |
Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 | JBL TUNE Beam have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than OPPO Enco W31. |
Bluetooth Profiles | - | Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) | |
Bluetooth Audio Codec | AAC | - | |
Active Noise Cancelling | - | Yes | JBL TUNE Beam are equipped with active noice cancellation. |
Active Noise Cancelling Technology | - | Smart Ambient | |
Noise Isolating | - | Yes | JBL TUNE Beam are equipped with a noise isolating function. |
Sound Output Mode | Stereo | Stereo | |
Sound Effects | - | Pure Bass | |
Frequency Response | 20 - 20000 Hz | 20 - 20000 Hz | Both headphones offer the same frequency response. |
Sensitivity | 95 dB | 97 dB/mW | JBL TUNE Beam have higher sensitivity than OPPO Enco W31. |
Impedance | - | 16 Ohm | |
Max Sound Pressure | - | 94 dB | |
Diaphragm | Graphene - 7 mm | 6 mm | OPPO Enco W31 have a thicker diaphragm than JBL TUNE Beam. |
Features | - | TalkThru technology |
MICROPHONE | OPPO Enco W31 | JBL TUNE Beam |
---|
Form Factor | Built-in | Built-in | |
---|---|---|---|
Noise Cancelling | Yes | - | OPPO Enco W31 microphone can cancel out ambient noise. |
Sensitivity | -38 dBV/Pascal | -38 dB | |
Microphones Included | - | 4 |
REMOTE CONTROL | OPPO Enco W31 | JBL TUNE Beam |
---|
Controls | Next/previous track, voice assistant | - |
---|
CABLE | OPPO Enco W31 | JBL TUNE Beam |
---|
Cable Type | USB charge cable - detachable | USB-C charge cable |
---|
FEATURES | OPPO Enco W31 | JBL TUNE Beam |
---|
Sensors | Touch sensor | Touch control |
---|
BATTERY AND CHARGING | OPPO Enco W31 | JBL TUNE Beam |
---|
Battery Type | Headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion | Headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion | |
---|---|---|---|
Battery Capacity | 25 mAh | 70 mAh | JBL TUNE Beam have a higher battery capacity than OPPO Enco W31. |
Battery Life | 3.5 hour(s) | 48 hour(s) | JBL TUNE Beam lasts longer on a single charge than the OPPO Enco W31. |
Battery Life Details | Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 15 hours Continuous playback: up to 3.5 hours |
Continuous playback (noise cancelling OFF): up to 12 hours Continuous playback (noise cancelling ON): up to 10 hours Continuous talk: up to 6.6 hours Continuous playback (with included charging case): up to 48 hours |
|
Charging Time | 2.5 hour(s) | 2 hour(s) | JBL TUNE Beam recharge faster than OPPO Enco W31. |
Included Qty | 2 | - |
OTHERS | OPPO Enco W31 | JBL TUNE Beam |
---|
Included Accessories | Ear tips kit, USB charge cable, charging case (350 mAh) | 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large), charging case, charging cable | |
---|---|---|---|
Compliant Standards | - | IP54, EN 62479:2010, GFSK, RED 2014/53/EU, EN 50663:2017, EN 300 328 V2.2.2, EN 301 489-1 V2.2.3, EN/IEC 63000:2018, EN 61000-3-3:2013+A1:2019, EN 55032:2015+A1:2020, Annex II (EU) 2015/863, 8DPSK, EN 55035:2017+A11:2020, EN 301 489-17 V3.2.4, EN IEC 61000-3-2:2019/A1:2021, Pi/4 DQPSK |