JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow vs. Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow and Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow vs. Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 28 g 14 g Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 are lighter than JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow headphones.
Colour Green | White | Black Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green
Protection - Sweat-resistant
Design - Sports
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) - 10 m
SOUND QUALITY JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Headphones Form Factor In-ear - behind-the-neck mount In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 3.0 Bluetooth 4.1 Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC -
Noise Isolating Yes - JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) - <3%
Sensitivity - 106 dB
Impedance - 16 Ohm
Diaphragm 8.5 mm 6 mm JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow have a thicker diaphragm than Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Magnet Material Neodymium -
MICROPHONE JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Form Factor Built-in -
Type - On-cable
REMOTE CONTROL JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Controls Volume control, play/pause, next/previous track Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track
CABLE JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Cable Type USB charge cable Micro-USB charge cable
BATTERY AND CHARGING JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 14 hour(s) 6 hour(s) JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305.
Standby Time - 240 hours
Charging Time 3 hour(s) 2 hour(s) Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 recharge faster than JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow.
CONNECTIONS JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Connector Type Bluetooth
USB
-
OTHERS JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Included Accessories 2 pairs of ear tips (small, medium) Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large)
Compatibility iPhone, iPad, iPod, Android phone -
Other Comparisons with JVC HA FX39BT Marshmallow
Other Comparisons with Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: