JBL Everest 310 vs. ISOtunes LINK

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of JBL Everest 310 and ISOtunes LINK. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

JBL Everest 310 vs. ISOtunes LINK Comparison Chart

DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS	JBL Everest 310	ISOtunes LINK

Product Type	Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless	Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Colour	Gun metal	-
Earpad Material	-	Memory foam
Protection	-	Sweat-resistant, IPX4, water-resistant
Recommended Use	Portable electronics	-

SOUND QUALITY	JBL Everest 310	ISOtunes LINK

Headphones Form Factor	On-ear	Full size
Headphones Technology	Dynamic	-
Foldable	Yes	-	JBL Everest 310 can be folded.
Connectivity Technology	Wireless	Wireless
Wireless Technology	Bluetooth	Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version	-	Bluetooth 4.2
Noise Isolating	-	Yes	ISOtunes LINK are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Volume Limiting Function	-	Yes
Sound Output Mode	Stereo	Stereo
Frequency Response	10 - 22000 Hz	-
Diaphragm	40 mm	-

MICROPHONE	JBL Everest 310	ISOtunes LINK

Form Factor	Built-in	Built-in

CABLE	JBL Everest 310	ISOtunes LINK

Cable Type	-	Micro-USB charge cable

FEATURES	JBL Everest 310	ISOtunes LINK

Features	-	24Db Noise Reduction Rating

BATTERY AND CHARGING	JBL Everest 310	ISOtunes LINK

Battery Type	Headphone battery rechargeable	1 x headphone battery rechargeable - Lithium Ion
Battery Life	20 hour(s)	14 hour(s)	JBL Everest 310 lasts longer on a single charge than the ISOtunes LINK.
Battery Life Details	-	Continuous hearing (with optional batteries): up to 28 hours
Charging Time	2 hour(s)	-
Included Qty	-	1