JBL E25BT vs. ifrogz AirTime

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of JBL E25BT and ifrogz AirTime. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

JBL E25BT vs. ifrogz AirTime Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS JBL E25BT ifrogz AirTime
Product Type Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless True wireless earphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 16.5 g 51.02 g JBL E25BT are lighter than JBL E25BT headphones.
Colour Black | White | Blue | Red Black | White | Blue
Protection - Sweat-resistant, IPX4
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
SOUND QUALITY JBL E25BT ifrogz AirTime
Headphones Form Factor In-ear In-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 -
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Sensitivity - 96 dB
Impedance 16 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 8.6 mm 8 mm JBL E25BT have a thicker diaphragm than ifrogz AirTime.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
In-Cord Volume Control Yes -
MICROPHONE JBL E25BT ifrogz AirTime
Form Factor - Built-in
Type On-cable -
REMOTE CONTROL JBL E25BT ifrogz AirTime
Controls Volume, answer/end -
BATTERY AND CHARGING JBL E25BT ifrogz AirTime
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 8 hour(s) 15 hour(s) ifrogz AirTime lasts longer on a single charge than the JBL E25BT.
Charging Time - 1.5 hour(s)
OTHERS JBL E25BT ifrogz AirTime
Included Accessories Carrying pouch, charging cable 3 pairs of ear tips, charging case, micro-USB charging cable
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other projects: