JAM Transit Lite vs. ifrogz Aurora Wireless

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of JAM Transit Lite and ifrogz Aurora Wireless. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

JAM Transit Lite vs. ifrogz Aurora Wireless Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS JAM Transit Lite ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless, wired - 3.5 mm jack Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless - 3.5 mm jack
Dimensions & Weight Details 91 g -
Colour Black Blue | Red | Black | White
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 91 m -
SOUND QUALITY JAM Transit Lite ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Headphones Form Factor On-ear On-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless, wired Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Noise Isolating - Yes ifrogz Aurora Wireless are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Diaphragm - 40 mm
MICROPHONE JAM Transit Lite ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Form Factor - Built-in
REMOTE CONTROL JAM Transit Lite ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Controls Volume, next/previous track Volume control, next/previous track
BATTERY AND CHARGING JAM Transit Lite ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 11 hours 12 hour(s) ifrogz Aurora Wireless lasts longer on a single charge than the JAM Transit Lite.
Charging Time 2 hour(s) -
WIRELESS LINK JAM Transit Lite ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Transmission Range 91 m -
CONNECTIONS JAM Transit Lite ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Connector Type Audio line-in (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm) Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm)
OTHERS JAM Transit Lite ifrogz Aurora Wireless
Included Accessories Carrying pouch -
Service & Support - Limited warranty - 2 years
Other projects: