Detailed comparison and review of ifrogz Coda Wireless and Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.
| DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Product Type | Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless | Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless - 3.5 mm jack | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | - | 180 g | |
| Colour | Blue | Red | Black | Rose gold | Gold | Silver | Black | Brown-grey | |
| Earpad Material | - | Memory foam | |
| Protection | Sweat-resistant | - | |
| Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) | 9 m | 10 m | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT have a greater operating distance than ifrogz Coda Wireless. |
| SOUND QUALITY | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Headphones Form Factor | On-ear | Full size | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headphones Technology | Dynamic | Dynamic | |
| Ear Cups Type | - | Closed | |
| Foldable | - | Yes | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT can be folded. |
| Connectivity Technology | Wireless | Wireless | |
| Wireless Technology | Bluetooth | Bluetooth | |
| Bluetooth Version | - | Bluetooth 5.0 | |
| Bluetooth Profiles | - | Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) | |
| Bluetooth Audio Codec | - | SBC, AAC, aptX | |
| Noise Isolating | - | Yes | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT are equipped with a noise isolating function. |
| Sound Output Mode | Stereo | Stereo | |
| Frequency Response | 20 - 20000 Hz | 5 - 40000 Hz | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT offer a larger frequency range than ifrogz Coda Wireless. |
| Max Input Power | - | 1500 mW | |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 98 dB/mW | ifrogz Coda Wireless have higher sensitivity than Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT. |
| Impedance | 32 Ohm | - | |
| Diaphragm | 40 mm | 45 mm | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT have a thicker diaphragm than ifrogz Coda Wireless. |
| In-Cord Volume Control | - | Yes |
| MICROPHONE | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Form Factor | Built-in | - | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | On-cable | On-cable | |
| Microphone Technology | - | Electret condenser | |
| Microphone Operation Mode | - | Omni-directional | |
| Frequency Response | - | 50 - 4000 Hz | |
| Sensitivity | - | -40 dB |
| REMOTE CONTROL | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Controls | Power on/off, volume control, answer/end, next/previous track | Volume |
|---|
| CABLE | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Cable Type | Audio cable | Headphones cable - detachable - L shaped - 1.2 m USB charge cable - detachable |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Cable Length | - | 1.2 m | |
| Detachable Cable | - | Yes |
| BATTERY AND CHARGING | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Battery Type | Headphone battery rechargeable | Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | 7 hours | 25 hour(s) | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT lasts longer on a single charge than the ifrogz Coda Wireless. |
| Standby Time | - | 1000 hours | |
| Charging Time | 2 hours | 5 hour(s) | ifrogz Coda Wireless recharge faster than ifrogz Coda Wireless. |
| WIRELESS LINK | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Transmission Range | 9 m | - |
|---|
| CONNECTIONS | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Connector Type | Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm) | Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 4-pole) |
|---|
| OTHERS | ifrogz Coda Wireless | Audio-Technica ATH SR50BT |
|---|
| Included Accessories | Micro-USB charging cable | - | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service & Support | Limited warranty - 2 years | Limited warranty - 2 years |
cs
sk
de
it
es
fr
hu
pt
ru
pl
br
ro
