ifrogz Aurora Wireless vs. Philips TAH4105RD

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of ifrogz Aurora Wireless and Philips TAH4105RD. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

ifrogz Aurora Wireless vs. Philips TAH4105RD Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS ifrogz Aurora Wireless Philips TAH4105RD
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless - 3.5 mm jack Headphones - wired
Height - 18.5 cm
Width - 16.5 cm
Depth - 4 cm
Weight - 153 g
Colour Blue | Red | Black | White Red
Recommended Use - Portable electronics
SOUND QUALITY ifrogz Aurora Wireless Philips TAH4105RD
Headphones Form Factor On-ear On-ear
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Ear Cups Type - Closed
Foldable - Yes Philips TAH4105RD can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wired
Wireless Technology Bluetooth -
Noise Isolating Yes Yes Both headphones are equipped with noise isolation.
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Frequency Response - 20 - 20000 Hz
Sensitivity - 106 dB
Impedance - 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 40 mm PET - 32 mm ifrogz Aurora Wireless have a thicker diaphragm than Philips TAH4105RD.
Magnet Material - NdFeB
MICROPHONE ifrogz Aurora Wireless Philips TAH4105RD
Form Factor Built-in Built-in
REMOTE CONTROL ifrogz Aurora Wireless Philips TAH4105RD
Controls Volume control, next/previous track Volume control, play/pause, answer call
BATTERY AND CHARGING ifrogz Aurora Wireless Philips TAH4105RD
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable -
Battery Life 12 hour(s) -
CONNECTIONS ifrogz Aurora Wireless Philips TAH4105RD
Connector Type Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm) -
OTHERS ifrogz Aurora Wireless Philips TAH4105RD
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years Limited warranty - 2 years
Other projects: