HyperX CloudX Stinger vs. Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of HyperX CloudX Stinger and Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

HyperX CloudX Stinger vs. Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS HyperX CloudX Stinger Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A
Product Type Headset - wired - 3.5 mm jack Headset - wired - USB
Series - 300 Series
Weight 275 g -
Recommended Use Game console Computer
SOUND QUALITY HyperX CloudX Stinger Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A
Headphones Form Factor Full size On-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic -
Ear Cups Type Closed -
Adjustable Headband Yes -
Connectivity Technology Wired Wired
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 18 - 23000 Hz 50 - 8000 Hz HyperX CloudX Stinger offer a larger frequency range than Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A.
Max Input Power 500 mW -
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) <2% -
Impedance 30 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure 102 dB 118 dB
Diaphragm 50 mm 28 mm HyperX CloudX Stinger have a thicker diaphragm than Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A.
Magnet Material Neodymium -
In-Cord Volume Control - Yes
MICROPHONE HyperX CloudX Stinger Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A
Form Factor Headset microphone -
Type Boom Boom
Microphone Technology Electret condenser -
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional Uni-directional
Frequency Response 50 - 18000 Hz -
Sensitivity -40 dB -
REMOTE CONTROL HyperX CloudX Stinger Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A
Controls Volume, microphone on/off Mute, volume
CABLE HyperX CloudX Stinger Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A
Cable Type - Headset cable
Cable Length 1.3 m -
CONNECTIONS HyperX CloudX Stinger Poly EncorePro 320, USB-A
Connector Type Headset (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 4-pole) Headset (4 PIN USB Type A)
Other projects: