Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 vs. beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 and beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 vs. beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ
Product Type Headset - wired - USB Headset - wired - 6.35 mm jack
Colour Black -
Recommended Use Computer -
SOUND QUALITY Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ
Headphones Form Factor Full size Full size
Headphones Technology - Dynamic
Ear Cups Type - Closed
Adjustable Headband Yes -
Connectivity Technology Wired Wired
Sound Output Mode - Stereo
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz -
Sensitivity 105 dB -
Impedance 32 Ohm 80 Ohm
Diaphragm 40 mm -
Features Function vibrations -
In-Cord Volume Control Yes -
MICROPHONE Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ
Type Boom Boom
Microphone Operation Mode Omni-directional Hypercardioid
Frequency Response 100 - 10000 Hz -
Sensitivity -36 dB -
Impedance 2.2 kOhm 200 Ohm
CABLE Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ
Cable Type Headset cable - 2.5 m Headset cable
Cable Length 2.5 m -
CONNECTIONS Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ
Connector Type USB (4 PIN USB Type A) Headset (phone stereo 6.3 mm)
OTHERS Hama uRage SoundZ 7.1 beyerdynamic DT 290-XJ
Included Accessories - Neutrik NC3MX XLR 3-pin microphone adapter, NPC3C 3-pole A-gauge jack headphone adapter
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years -
Other projects: