Detailed comparison and review of Erato Apollo 7 and Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.
| DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS | Erato Apollo 7 | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 |
|---|
| Product Type | Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless | Earphones - Bluetooth - wireless | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 1.54 cm | - | |
| Depth | 2.22 cm | - | |
| Weight | 4 g | 14 g | Erato Apollo 7 are lighter than Erato Apollo 7 headphones. |
| Dimensions & Weight Details | Charging case: 6.25 cm x 4 cm x 2.55 cm / 52 g | - | |
| Colour | Luscious gold | Black | Dark blue | Coral | Lime green | |
| Protection | Waterproof | Sweat-resistant | |
| Design | - | Sports | |
| Recommended Use | Portable electronics | Portable electronics | |
| Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) | 9.1 m | 10 m | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have a greater operating distance than Erato Apollo 7. |
| SOUND QUALITY | Erato Apollo 7 | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 |
|---|
| Headphones Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity Technology | Wireless | Wireless | |
| Wireless Technology | Bluetooth | Bluetooth | |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 | Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version. |
| Bluetooth Profiles | Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) | Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) | |
| Sound Output Mode | Stereo | Stereo | |
| Frequency Response | 20 - 20000 Hz | 20 - 20000 Hz | Both headphones offer the same frequency response. |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | - | <3% | |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 106 dB | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have higher sensitivity than Erato Apollo 7. |
| Impedance | 16 Ohm | 16 Ohm | |
| Diaphragm | 5.8 mm | 6 mm | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 have a thicker diaphragm than Erato Apollo 7. |
| MICROPHONE | Erato Apollo 7 | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 |
|---|
| Form Factor | Built-in | - | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | - | On-cable | |
| Microphone Operation Mode | Omni-directional | - | |
| Audio Input Details | Omni-directional | - | |
| Sensitivity | -42 dB | - |
| REMOTE CONTROL | Erato Apollo 7 | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 |
|---|
| Controls | Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track | Answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track |
|---|
| CABLE | Erato Apollo 7 | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 |
|---|
| Cable Type | USB charge cable | Micro-USB charge cable |
|---|
| BATTERY AND CHARGING | Erato Apollo 7 | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 |
|---|
| Battery Type | Headphone battery rechargeable | Headphone battery rechargeable | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | 4 hours | 6 hour(s) | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 lasts longer on a single charge than the Erato Apollo 7. |
| Standby Time | - | 240 hours | |
| Charging Time | - | 2 hour(s) |
| OTHERS | Erato Apollo 7 | Poly - Plantronics Backbeat FIT 305 |
|---|
| Included Accessories | 3 pairs of Comply foam ear tips, charging case, 3 pairs of ear stabilisers (small, medium, large) | Carrying pouch, 3 pairs of ear tips (small, medium, large) |
|---|
cs
sk
de
it
es
fr
hu
pt
ru
pl
br
ro
