EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS vs. ifrogz Coda Wireless

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS and ifrogz Coda Wireless. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS vs. ifrogz Coda Wireless Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Product Type Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - NFC Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 227 g -
Colour - Blue | Red | Black | Rose gold | Gold | Silver
Protection - Sweat-resistant
Recommended Use Portable electronics, computer -
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 25 m 9 m EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS have a greater operating distance than ifrogz Coda Wireless.
SOUND QUALITY EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Headphones Form Factor Full size On-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic Dynamic
Ear Cups Type Closed -
Foldable Yes - EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.2 -
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP), Device ID Profile (DIP) -
Active Noise Cancelling Yes - EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS are equipped with active noice cancellation.
Active Noise Cancelling Technology Adaptive Noise Control -
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 17 - 23000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS offer a larger frequency range than ifrogz Coda Wireless.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) 0.5% -
Sensitivity 118 dB 100 dB EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS have higher sensitivity than ifrogz Coda Wireless.
Impedance 46 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm - 40 mm
MICROPHONE EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Form Factor - Built-in
Type - On-cable
Frequency Response 150 - 6800 Hz -
REMOTE CONTROL EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Controls - Power on/off, volume control, answer/end, next/previous track
CABLE EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Cable Type Audio cable
Micro-USB cable
Audio cable
BATTERY AND CHARGING EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Battery Type Headset battery rechargeable Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 30 hours 7 hours EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS lasts longer on a single charge than the ifrogz Coda Wireless.
Standby Time 360 hours -
Charging Time 3 hours 2 hours ifrogz Coda Wireless recharge faster than EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS.
WIRELESS LINK EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Transmission Range 25 m 9 m EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS have greater transmission range than ifrogz Coda Wireless.
CONNECTIONS EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Connector Type - Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm)
OTHERS EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS ifrogz Coda Wireless
Included Accessories Carrying case, Bluetooth adapter, airplane adapter Micro-USB charging cable
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years Limited warranty - 2 years
Other Comparisons with EPOS I SENNHEISER IMPACT MB 660 UC MS
Other Comparisons with ifrogz Coda Wireless
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: