CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Detailed comparison and review of CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB and Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams. With our comprehensive overview, you can simply compare design, sound quality, but also other key features of both headphones and easily decide which ones are the right choice for you. Our goal is to help you identify the main differences between products and find the headphones that best fit your needs and expectations.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB vs. Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Product Type Headset - 2.4/5 GHz - wireless Headset - Bluetooth - wireless - USB-C via Bluetooth adapter
Height 20.5 cm -
Width 16 cm -
Depth 10 cm -
Weight 330 g 150 g Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams are lighter than CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB headphones.
Body Material Aluminium -
Earpad Material Synthetic leather, memory foam -
Recommended Use Game console, computer -
Gaming Yes -
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 9 m 30 m Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams have a greater operating distance than CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB.
SOUND QUALITY CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Headphones Form Factor Full size On-ear
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology 2.4/5 GHz radio frequency Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version - Bluetooth 5.0
Bluetooth Profiles - Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec - SBC, mSBC
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Built-in Decoders Dolby Atmos -
Frequency Response 20 - 20000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Both headphones offer the same frequency response.
Sensitivity 109 dB +/- 3dB -
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 50 mm 32 mm CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB have a thicker diaphragm than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Magnet Material Neodymium -
Features - SoundGuard DIGITAL Technology
MICROPHONE CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Form Factor Detachable headset microphone Headset microphone
Type Boom Boom
Microphone Operation Mode Uni-directional Uni-directional
Frequency Response 100 - 10000 Hz -
Audio Input Details Uni-directional - 100 - 10000 Hz - Output Impedance 2 kOhm -
Sensitivity -40 dB -
Impedance 2 kOhm -
Microphones Included - 2
REMOTE CONTROL CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Controls Game/chat balance Mute, volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track, reject call, redial, voice assistant
CABLE CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Cable Type USB-C charge cable - 1.8 m -
FEATURES CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Features - Voice alerts
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible - Yes
Intelligent Assistant - Alexa
BATTERY AND CHARGING CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Battery Type Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headset battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Capacity 1050 mAh 360 mAh CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB have a higher battery capacity than Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life 20 hour(s) 15 hour(s) CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB lasts longer on a single charge than the Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Continuous talk: up to 12 hours
Standby Time - 312 hours
Charging Time - 1.5 hour(s)
CONNECTIONS CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Connector Type - Wireless adapter (USB Type-C)
OTHERS CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Included Accessories - Bluetooth USB-C adapter
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years -
Other Comparisons with CORSAIR Gaming HS75 XB
Other Comparisons with Poly Voyager 4220 UC, USB-C, Microsoft Teams
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: