Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT vs. Skullcandy Crusher Evo

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT and Skullcandy Crusher Evo. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT vs. Skullcandy Crusher Evo Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless - NFC Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 190 g 312 g Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT are lighter than Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT headphones.
Colour White | Black Collina Strada | Dark blue/green | True black | Grey
Recommended Use Portable electronics, phone Game console, portable electronics, computer
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m -
SOUND QUALITY Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Headphones Form Factor On-ear Full size
Headphones Technology Dynamic -
Ear Cups Type Closed -
Adjustable Headband Yes -
Foldable Yes Yes Both headphones can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 5.0 Skullcandy Crusher Evo have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) -
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Sound Effects - Sensory Bass, Personal Sound
Frequency Response 5 - 35000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT offer a larger frequency range than Skullcandy Crusher Evo.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) - <1%
Sensitivity 97 dB/mW -
Impedance 41 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure - 100 dB
Diaphragm 40 mm 40 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
In-Cord Volume Control Yes -
MICROPHONE Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Form Factor - Built-in
Microphone Technology Condenser -
Frequency Response 50 - 4000 Hz -
Audio Input Details Omni-directional - 50 - 4000 Hz -
Sensitivity -44 dB -
REMOTE CONTROL Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Controls Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Volume, bass, answer/end, next/previous track, voice assistant
CABLE Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Cable Type Headphones cable - detachable - L shaped - 1.2 m
USB charge cable - 1 m
USB-C charge cable - detachable
Headphones cable - detachable
Cable Length 1.2 m -
Detachable Cable Yes -
FEATURES Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Features - Tile finding technology
Internet of Things (IoT) Compatible - Yes
Intelligent Assistant - Alexa ready, Google Assistant ready, Siri ready
BATTERY AND CHARGING Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 30 hour(s) 40 hour(s) Skullcandy Crusher Evo lasts longer on a single charge than the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 40 hours
Standby Time 1000 hours -
Charging Time 5 hour(s) 1 hour(s) Skullcandy Crusher Evo recharge faster than Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT.
WIRELESS LINK Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Transmission Range 10 m -
CONNECTIONS Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Connector Type Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 4-pole) -
OTHERS Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Included Accessories - Travel bag
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years Limited warranty - 1 year
Other Comparisons with Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT
Other Comparisons with Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: