Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT vs. Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT and Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT vs. Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless - NFC Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Weight 190 g 195 g Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT are lighter than Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT headphones.
Colour White | Black White
Recommended Use Portable electronics, phone Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Headphones Form Factor On-ear On-ear
Headphones Technology Dynamic Dynamic
Ear Cups Type Closed Closed
Adjustable Headband Yes -
Foldable Yes - Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.2 Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT have a more advanced version of Bluetooth than Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Sound Output Mode Stereo -
Frequency Response 5 - 35000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT offer a larger frequency range than Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT.
Max Input Power - 10 mW
Sensitivity 97 dB/mW 102 dB Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT have higher sensitivity than Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT.
Impedance 41 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 40 mm PET - 32 mm Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT have a thicker diaphragm than Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT.
Magnet Material - NdFeB
In-Cord Volume Control Yes -
MICROPHONE Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Form Factor - Built-in
Microphone Technology Condenser -
Frequency Response 50 - 4000 Hz -
Audio Input Details Omni-directional - 50 - 4000 Hz -
Sensitivity -44 dB -
REMOTE CONTROL Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Controls Volume, answer/end, play/pause, next/previous track Volume control, answer/end
CABLE Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Cable Type Headphones cable - detachable - L shaped - 1.2 m
USB charge cable - 1 m
USB power cable - detachable
Cable Length 1.2 m -
Detachable Cable Yes -
BATTERY AND CHARGING Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable
Battery Life 30 hour(s) 15 hour(s) Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT lasts longer on a single charge than the Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT.
Battery Life Details - Continuous playback: up to 15 hours
Standby Time 1000 hours -
Charging Time 5 hour(s) 3 hour(s) Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT recharge faster than Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT.
WIRELESS LINK Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Transmission Range 10 m -
CONNECTIONS Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Connector Type Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 4-pole) USB (power only)
Bluetooth
OTHERS Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Service & Support Limited warranty - 2 years -
Other Comparisons with Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT
Other Comparisons with Philips UpBeat TAUH202WT
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: