Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT vs. Philips TAH5205WT

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

In depth comparison and review of Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT and Philips TAH5205WT. Compare design, audio features, functions and other important specifications to easily choose the right headphones for you. Our goal is to help you uncover differences between the products and find the headphones that will best fit your needs.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT vs. Philips TAH5205WT Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT Philips TAH5205WT
Product Type Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless Headphones - Bluetooth - wireless
Height - 19.5 cm
Width - 18.5 cm
Depth - 4 cm
Weight 263 g 210 g Philips TAH5205WT are lighter than Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT headphones.
Colour - White
Earpad Material Memory foam -
Recommended Use Portable electronics Portable electronics
Bluetooth Range (Operating Distance) 10 m 10 m The maximum operating distance of both headphones is the same.
SOUND QUALITY Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT Philips TAH5205WT
Headphones Form Factor Full size Full size
Headphones Technology Dynamic Dynamic
Ear Cups Type - Closed
Foldable Yes Yes Both headphones can be folded.
Connectivity Technology Wireless Wireless
Wireless Technology Bluetooth Bluetooth
Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0 Both headphones have the same Bluetooth version.
Bluetooth Profiles Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Headset Profile (HSP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP) Hands-Free Profile (HFP), Advanced Audio Distribution Profile (A2DP), Audio/Video Remote Control Profile (AVRCP)
Bluetooth Audio Codec SBC, AAC, aptX -
Active Noise Cancelling Yes - Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT are equipped with active noice cancellation.
Active Noise Cancelling Technology Hybrid ANC -
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Sound Effects - Bass Boost
Frequency Response 5 - 40000 Hz 20 - 20000 Hz Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT offer a larger frequency range than Philips TAH5205WT.
Max Input Power 1000 mW -
Sensitivity 100 dB/mW 90 dB Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT have higher sensitivity than Philips TAH5205WT.
Impedance 35 Ohm 32 Ohm
Diaphragm 40 mm 40 mm Both headphones are designed with same thick diaphragm.
Magnet Material - Neodymium
MICROPHONE Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT Philips TAH5205WT
Form Factor Built-in Built-in
Microphone Technology Electret condenser -
Microphone Operation Mode Omni-directional -
Frequency Response 50 - 4000 Hz -
Sensitivity -44 dB -
REMOTE CONTROL Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT Philips TAH5205WT
Controls Volume control, answer/end Volume control, hold, reject call, answer call
CABLE Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT Philips TAH5205WT
Cable Type Headphones cable - detachable - L shaped - 1.2 m USB charge cable
Headphones cable
Cable Length 1.2 m -
Detachable Cable Yes Yes
BATTERY AND CHARGING Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT Philips TAH5205WT
Battery Type Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer Headphone battery rechargeable - lithium polymer
Battery Life 60 hour(s) 29 hour(s) Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT lasts longer on a single charge than the Philips TAH5205WT.
Battery Life Details Continuous playback (noise cancelling ON / Bluetooth): up to 35 hours
Continuous playback (noise cancelling ON / cable connection): up to 60 hours
Continuous playback: up to 29 hours
Charging Time 5.5 hour(s) 2 hour(s) Philips TAH5205WT recharge faster than Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT.
CONNECTIONS Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT Philips TAH5205WT
Connector Type Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 4-pole) USB (power only) (USB Type-C)
Headphones
OTHERS Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT Philips TAH5205WT
Included Accessories Carrying case, airplane adapter, micro-USB cable (0.3m) -
Other Comparisons with Audio-Technica QuietPoint ATH-ANC900BT
Other Comparisons with Philips TAH5205WT
Other Popular Headphones Comparisons
Other projects: