AKG K92 vs. Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C

Headphones Comparison, Reviews and Tests

Side by side comparison and review of AKG K92 and Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C. Compare design, sound quality and other key specifications and features to simplify the choice of your perfect headphones. Our goal is to make it easier for you to decide on the headphones that will best meet your expectations by revealing the main differences between the products.

Headphones Specifications Comparison

AKG K92 vs. Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C Comparison Chart
DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS AKG K92 Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C
Product Type Headphones - wired - 3.5 mm jack Headset - wired - USB-C
Series - 300 Series
Weight 200 g -
Colour Matte black -
Earpad Material Leatherette -
Recommended Use Professional audio Computer
SOUND QUALITY AKG K92 Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C
Headphones Form Factor Full size On-ear
Ear Cups Type Closed -
Connectivity Technology Wired Wired
Noise Isolating Yes - AKG K92 are equipped with a noise isolating function.
Sound Output Mode Stereo Stereo
Frequency Response 16 - 22000 Hz 50 - 8000 Hz AKG K92 offer a larger frequency range than Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C.
Max Input Power 200 mW -
Sensitivity 113 dB -
Impedance 32 Ohm 32 Ohm
Max Sound Pressure - 118 dB
Diaphragm 40 mm 28 mm AKG K92 have a thicker diaphragm than Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C.
In-Cord Volume Control - Yes
MICROPHONE AKG K92 Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C
Type - Boom
Microphone Operation Mode - Uni-directional
REMOTE CONTROL AKG K92 Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C
Controls - Mute, volume
CABLE AKG K92 Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C
Cable Type Headphones cable - 3 m Headset cable
CONNECTIONS AKG K92 Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C
Connector Type Headphones (mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm) Headset (24 pin USB-C)
OTHERS AKG K92 Poly EncorePro 320, USB-C
Included Accessories 3.5 mm to 6.3 mm adapter -
Other projects: